• Becoming a member is completely free!

    • Join the community and start contributing to a large source of sea angling information.
    • Members who are regular contributors and have posted more than 25 times, will see no adverts.
    • Become an active member and you can enter member exclusive competitions.

    REGISTER FOR FREE HERE

Ian Golds Rod Rests

crablante

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2024
Messages
45
Reaction score
59
Points
18
Location
UK
Favourite Fishing
Shore
Hey guys and girls,

I'm new to the forum (hello), not new to fishing, and up until last year I've only ever used sand-spikes. They're light and simple but you're also at the mercy of the ground (too soft, too hard, etc) so last year I bought the Shakespeare Salt Beach Rest. I've really enjoyed it and it's very practical but it's a tad heavy compared to the sand-spikes, so this year I bought an Ian Golds rod rest - it's 1kg lighter and the brand seems to be universally loved (at least that's the impression I have).

I definitely don't love it and here's why...

The quality and design of the plastic parts - especially the one encircled in red - are awful. The plastic is soft so bends under load, and the design is poor because the surface area that encapsulates the aluminium V-section is relatively small so it slides under load. The plastic components on the Shakespeare version are so much better - hard plastic and maximum surface area - so no bending or sliding under load. Also, the aluminium that the cups and heads mount to is too thin, so again it bends under load (the Shakespeare aluminium is thicker and hardly bends).

In the end I made a hybrid - Ian Golds tripod married with the Shakespeare plastics, double head, and double cup (see picture). I really like this setup and it's a shame I had to do it because it should be a relatively simple task for Ian Golds to update the components (maybe I'll write to them?).

The reason for this post is not only to vent the issues I had, I also want to hear from your experiences: Do you think I'm talking nonsense? Are their rod rests universally loved? Could it be they used to be good but not any more?

Happy fishing.


ig-double-cup-13.jpghybrid.jpg
 
Well I highly rate my Ian Golds super match rest, but mine is knocking on 30 years old and has got a completely different design to that.
If it still slides up/down then you haven't done it up tight enough which might also firm it up by stressing the plastic.
Mine
 

Attachments

  • PA180005.JPG
    PA180005.JPG
    118.6 KB · Views: 3
  • PA180006.JPG
    PA180006.JPG
    208 KB · Views: 3
Well I highly rate my Ian Golds super match rest, but mine is knocking on 30 years old and has got a completely different design to that.
If it still slides up/down then you haven't done it up tight enough which might also firm it up by stressing the plastic.
Mine
I swear I've done it up VERY tight - the design and material on mine are inherently flawed: plastic is too soft (i.e. flexible), clamping surface area on the V-shape is too small, tolerances are too slack. The Shakespeare version you do up "normal" tight and it doesn't budge!

Thanks for the pictures - yes quite different! Compared to mine yours looks to have more clamping surface area and tighter tolerances. Your aluminium looks are thin as mine, it doesn't bend for you? For me it would bend BUT maybe it's the spot I was fishing (the current can get pretty strong) and at a different venue I'd be fine.
 
Is it a case that the grey shoed penny pinchers have got to the procurement/manufacturing budgets and cheapened the parts? Mine is also decades old and like Angrybear I've had no issues with it whatsoever, infact I have nothing but praise for it
 
Your aluminium looks are thin as mine, it doesn't bend for you? For me it would bend BUT maybe it's the spot I was fishing (the current can get pretty strong) and at a different venue I'd be fine.
It has got some flex, but no it doesn't bend, & I've used it on the Bristol channel many, many times,
There are different widths, my centres are 8" apart.
 
Is it a case that the grey shoed penny pinchers have got to the procurement/manufacturing budgets and cheapened the parts? Mine is also decades old and like Angrybear I've had no issues with it whatsoever, infact I have nothing but praise for it

Yeah maybe some penny pinching has happened OR maybe good intentions (re-design) with unintended consequences (inherently-bad-re-design). It would be interesting to compare old vs new side-by-side.
 
Looking at it the problem is that the inside of the angle is hollow, I bet if that was made solid you'd see it in a different light.
I'd coat the leg with release agent & fill the inside angle with epoxy or hot melt glue, to give a decent surface to clamp against.
 
Welcome to the Madhouse Crablante!

You've sort of answered your own question in your original post. Yes, the Salt tripod is a little heavier, but that is also why it is stronger.
Never had an Ian Golds Tripod, but I've had a 2nd hand Salt for a few years and love it. Just added an extra 'Y' rest & Cup to keep my lure rod out of the sand. The Salt in it's bag attaches to my Shakey Agility rod bag, and I usually lay that across my fishing trolley, so the weight isn't really an issue.
 
Looking at it the problem is that the inside of the angle is hollow, I bet if that was made solid you'd see it in a different light.
I'd coat the leg with release agent & fill the inside angle with epoxy or hot melt glue, to give a decent surface to clamp against.

I could BUT sorting out them plastics feels too much like polishing a ... :censored:
 
Welcome to the Madhouse Crablante!

You've sort of answered your own question in your original post. Yes, the Salt tripod is a little heavier, but that is also why it is stronger.
Never had an Ian Golds Tripod, but I've had a 2nd hand Salt for a few years and love it. Just added an extra 'Y' rest & Cup to keep my lure rod out of the sand. The Salt in it's bag attaches to my Shakey Agility rod bag, and I usually lay that across my fishing trolley, so the weight isn't really an issue.

Yes and no - for sure the plastics weight a bit more (plus there are more plastic parts too) BUT the main weight difference is the extra aluminium to make it telescopic.

Ahhh a trolley - I'm tempted to get one, for now I'll stay put as I like to keep kit to a minimum.
 

Support Us

Support from our members means we don't need to plaster advertisements around the website! Keeping it clean and fresh! Maintaining a website such as this takes time and money, and your support helps to keep the lights on, provide new features for the website and, hopefully, make you feel warm and fuzzy!

Thank you for considering to help support our work.
Back
Top