The Third Earl
Well-known member
It looks like a mechanised whipping jiggery thing to me .No idea, ask that stalwart member, The Third Earl chappie AKA Dave.
You cant stop progress .
Dave
Becoming a member is completely free!
It looks like a mechanised whipping jiggery thing to me .No idea, ask that stalwart member, The Third Earl chappie AKA Dave.
Thought you wrapped rod eyes, not whipped...It turns the blank to wrap the thread. I think technically a whipping machine - at least one that's built for rod building rather than for the likes of Max Moseley - would require the rod to be stationary and the thread to rotate round it?
You do and they are guides, not eyes or rings.Thought you wrapped rod eyes, not whipped...
Ian.
I sit corrected, can't be bothered to stand.You do and they are guides, not eyes or rings.
I have used spiral wrapped rods and cant really see or tell any difference , so I am guessing the difference must be minimal to the user ?Built (from memory) 12 of them. Not my cup of tea as I`m a dinosaur but seems they do work. On the pic I posted the last 3 guides before tip were all in line with the tip
Just to create more unrest, it would appear that rod builders or repairers were whipping on rings ( not guides) well before all this modern “wraps and guides” stuff was invented, in a nutshell , the modern terms are just re inventing the wheel.
Looking in my anglers library I found lots of references to “ whipping and rod rings”
Looky here
View attachment 58073
View attachment 58074
View attachment 58076
Dave
Not too tightly Wrapped, sorry i mean Whipped then..I consider miself slightly whipped .
But not wrapped .
Dave