Dutchman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2020
- Messages
- 13,051
- Reaction score
- 26,479
- Points
- 113
- Location
- North Wales
- Favourite Fishing
- Lure
You don't conserve a species by sticking a big hook in it's gob and fighting it to exhaustion.
Becoming a member is completely free!
But that can be said for every fish we catch, who knows the survival rate of the everyday fish?You don't conserve a species by sticking a big hook in it's gob and fighting it to exhaustion.
I am not trying to conserve a bass when i go fishing for the pot, if that were the case i would not fish for them and the thread is all about Tuna.But that can be said for every fish we catch, who knows the survival rate of the everyday fish?
Good job we weren’t counting on you to make up the numbers then. PhewIMO i would rather not even try targeting that species, let alone catching and tagging them and putting them through that stress.
But if you feel that it is ok for you to do that, i am not going to change your mind, am i!
Not if you paid me to even try!Good job we weren’t counting on you to make up the numbers then. Phew
Do you only fish for the table then? How do you avoid fish that you aren’t going to eat?I am not trying to conserve a bass when i go fishing for the pot, if that were the case i would not fish for them and the thread is all about Tuna.
Just remind me, how are you conserving the tuna by putting it through all that stress and not knowing the survival rates just to tag it?Do you only fish for the table then? How do you avoid fish that you aren’t going to eat?
I’m not fishing for them myself, but I think the general idea is that by tagging they gather data and put it all into a machine that then puts out a ven diagram or something, same as they do with sharks. This data gives a better understanding of the fish’s range, population and longevity. Maybe ??Just remind me, how are you conserving the tuna by putting it through all that stress and not knowing the survival rates just to tag it?
I think if a tagged fish sinks to the bottom and doesn’t move its dead. So by tagging you can find out how well they survive. I’m pretty sure we won’t be the first to do it so, I’m confident they will be ok and survive, otherwise it wouldn’t be allowed.Just remind me, how are you conserving the tuna by putting it through all that stress and not knowing the survival rates just to tag it?
I was told that the tags float and have a homing device on them that motors them back to the defra office?I think if a tagged fish sinks to the bottom and doesn’t move its dead. So by tagging you can find out how well they survive. I’m pretty sure we won’t be the first to do it so, I’m confident they will be ok and survive, otherwise it wouldn’t be allowed.
"Maybe"I’m not fishing for them myself, but I think the general idea is that by tagging they gather data and put it all into a machine that then puts out a ven diagram or something, same as they do with sharks. This data gives a better understanding of the fish’s range, population and longevity. Maybe ??
The accepted mortality rate is 5%. So one in about twenty fish will die. Any data collected will end up in the hands of the commercials both UK boats and more worrying non UK boats that ha\/e tuna quotasI think if a tagged fish sinks to the bottom and doesn’t move its dead. So by tagging you can find out how well they survive. I’m pretty sure we won’t be the first to do it so, I’m confident they will be ok and survive, otherwise it wouldn’t be allowed.
And?The accepted mortality rate is 5%. So one in about twenty fish will die. Any data collected will end up in the hands of the commercials both UK boats and more worrying non UK boats that ha\/e tuna quotas
I would think that any commercial boats that intended to target them already have a lot better idea about them than the AT.The accepted mortality rate is 5%. So one in about twenty fish will die. Any data collected will end up in the hands of the commercials both UK boats and more worrying non UK boats that ha\/e tuna quotas
I would think initially he is saying that by killing 5per cent, that is not conserving the species, unless you can confirm that it is!And?
It's nothing to with the AT It's an extension of the Thunnus Project and at the moment the mo\/ement of these fish is an unknownI would think that any commercial boats that intended to target them already have a lot better idea about them than the AT
Well, take 5% away from 100% leaves 95% alive. I don’t see that as decimating the species. Any lose is sad, but even pin whiting or pout die needlessly if they don’t go back well. Are they less important to the chain and eco system?I would think initially he is saying that by killing 5per cent, that is not conserving the species, unless you can confirm that it is!
So you're happy with 1 in 20 dying just so you can ha\/e a dick measuring competition with it?And?
Does having a capital V in the word make it more important?ha\/e