• Becoming a member is completely free!

    • Join the community and start contributing to a large source of sea angling information.
    • Members who are regular contributors and have posted more than 25 times, will see no adverts.
    • Become an active member and you can enter member exclusive competitions.

    REGISTER FOR FREE HERE

Shore Fishing Past and Present.

Mickfish

Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2024
Messages
29
Reaction score
90
Points
13
Location
Warrington
Favourite Fishing
Shore
As I am about to return to shore fishing after many decades (though I do have yearly boat trips for bass and cod with my old mates) I got down several of my sea angling books from the loft and I bought several more second hand, many in nearly new condition at excellent prices. Reading them and looking at the illustrations and recalling my own more distant memories of shore fishing from my youth, I pondered the difference between shore fishing then and what it seems to be (because I haven't started in earnest) yet.

What struck me when I looked at the older books, like the Guiness Book of Sea Angling, is just how many fish were killed that wouldn't be now. What now seem unpleasant pictures of huge specimen conger, skate and sharks (the latter shown in ignominious positions hung up on pulley hooks on the quayside) and dripping with blood would not be seen now. We have simply become more conservation minded and specimen catches can be recorded with camera or phones and released. God knows with the appalling demand for shark fins in the Asian market this wonderful predator is suffering devastating losses globally in the most cruel and barbaric way, so its good to UK anglers adopting a more enlightened attitude than yesteryear. When I was young there were many wet fish shops and skinned skate wings (still an expensive delicacy in many high end restaurants), dog fish, sold as "wuff” in Sunderland, or sold as rock salmon in the fish and chip shops of Norwich when I was a student, were common plate fish. But stewed "wuff" with its strong smell is not attractive to modern families, I suppose it’s gone the same way as tripe - it's a generational thing. BTW when in North Shields fish market many decades ago buying bait, I watched a skilled worker skin a dog fish in seconds, placing it on a nail and slitting its skin in a circular fashion and peeling it off like a sock! Similarly, last year when fishing the Mersey in a boat hoping for cod, none turned up but thornback after thornback came to our baits, all were released with not a thought about killing them and removing their wings, all were released safely - Rick Stein would be very surprised, I guess having his 'beurre noir' (burnt butter) ready and waiting in the pan.

Watching a you tube fishing video recently of "Spartan" - Steve Parton of Northumberland collecting masses of dangerous and unsafe discarded anglers waste line and the like, conscientiously baggingthen binning it, made me realise that not much has changed since my youth. Two years ago, lure fishing for Bass just below Penmon in Anglesey, I collected masses of heavy duty discarded line left by two young lads fishing ahead of me. The thought of what this might have done to sea birds was frightening, or marine life if it were blown into the sea. Steve understandably berated those responsible in his video but as a nation we are still appalling litter droppers and this seems to still extend to some sea anglers today still sadly.

One thing I will always remember from my youth was the appalling treatment of fish caught, especially "by catch". blennies and eels were treated barbarically and flounders who had engorged a hook similarly so. Once again YouTube angers like Darren of "North East Angling" take the time to show how to safely unhook a flounder which has engorged the hook. But is advice heeded today? You tell me. Also when anglers catch a fish for the pot is it despatched quickly today rather than slowly suffocating and wriggling for ages on the ground? And on the subject of YouTube what a revolution that facility and the internet in general is a a guide and encouragement to new or returning anglers like me, with many altruistic anglers "posting" their films and wonderful forums like this there to help and entertain its members. Only books in my youth, but we were perhaps more avid readers then.

Tackle has advanced immensely, of course, but I remember the old guys of Sunderland Old Pier casting Scarborough Reels and Rods with wonderful skill in the cold winters of the late 50's and early 60s to catch fine codling with their mussel baits to the cod entering the Wear estuary in search of food. But commercial fishing was not so ruthless then and there were clearly more fish about. Now we have wonderful tackle but less fish or smaller fish to seek out in the main and from my travels that seems to be a far reaching phenomenon. Florida Gulfside with its strict conservation measures being an example of what wonderful angling sport can be made available (to the benefit of the local economy) if sensible conservation measures are adopted. But sadly the wonderful fishing I experienced in the Isle of Arran in the 70's fishing for cod and haddock and in the Firth of Clyde generally is a thing of the past due to the ravages of over fishing and dreadful clam dredging in particular. Though the expansion of bass as a UK wide shore fish is one great positive developments for sport angling today. A few years back I was fishing in a small estuary for sea trout off the Kyle of Tongue in the northernmost part of Scotland. They had not arrived but we had wonderful sport catching small bass (all released) on light fly rods. Certainly no bass in the North East in my youth but they have colonised that coast too today.

Lastly, sea angling still thankfully remains a very chummy and friendly sport, helped by forums like this and just the sheer kindness of sea anglers. There is a mental health crisis in this country and group activities with fresh air and physical exertion such as walking and angling is surely a way to build up people's social confidence. Authorities should take note as with greater chance of catching something for the pot more people might be encouraged to take up this wonderful sport. How much could our economy benefit by restricting the worst ravages of commercial fishing to bring more people into shore fishing to enhance their health in what is an island nation anyway?

Mick
 
Last edited:
What is the next chapter I wonder Mick?

In comparing shore fishing today with decades ago I'm sure the friendly dimension will still be there as it was in yesteryear. Putting aside understandably not wanting to reveal your favourite bass marks etc, anglers like to talk and help one another. Salmon anglers certainly do during the many hours/days of blanking. After all this forum is about anglers talking to anglers.

And as for any next chapter (or theme for a thread) well that would be very presumptuous. It should really be about my first shore trip in ages but an imminent operation has put that back so it will almost certainly be on the same theoretical pondering type theme where forum members might kindly chip in. Perhaps “do we shore anglers think outside the box enough?” Which means do we challenge long held assumptions about shore fishing practices and methods enough, where forum members might kindly chip in. Topics like do flounder and plaice really want bling on rigs, what’s the evidence? Should we use more two hook lateral rigs with a smaller hook to catch a small live bait and a larger hook to catch a bigger predator moving in for the kill - the tethered goat and the tiger syndrome, as it were. A method a Spanish friend once showed me to devastating effect catching John Dory in Majorca. Should tackle manufacturers make neutral density soft plastics which can be retrieved slowly near but not along the very bottom to catch fish we would normally use bait for. Can the carp hair rig idea be adapted successfully for shore angling? And so on. Though I fully accept that a ‘been there, done it got the tea shirt’ response might justifiably be the natural reaction.

Mick
 
Last edited:
Well I certainly remember the bad old days where every fish in a match had to be brought to the scales,
after the weigh-in every bin in the area would be full of dead fish, could almost bring a man to tears,
at least now other points systems can be used.
I remember a session at Abbotsbury where the 2 anglers next to me collected all their waste in to a carrier bag,
only to then hurl the bag in to the sea !!

The hair rig has been copied/adapted they call it the dingle dangle or some such rubbish.
 
.
I remember a session at Abbotsbury where the 2 anglers next to me collected all their waste in to a carrier bag,
only to then hurl the bag in to the sea !!
Still happens. I found a bush full of bagged-up dogsh1t at Aberystwyth on Friday. I mean - who do they think is going to clear it up - the Wombles?
 
Some good musings there. Never fished any heaviest bag comps and was disgusted by them even then, but certainly when I was younger we fished for best specimen and would keep one or two fish.
Seems criminal now that double figure hounds and conger would be killed just to take to a weigh in to try and win a few quid.
I did the same and not proud of it, but literally everyone was doing it, thankfully now that attitude has mostly changed.

Your questions on the bling, live baiting and hair rig have all been discussed on here I believe. Not that it hurts to discuss them again!
 
Watched a “piece” on one of those fishing channels as was gleaning info on a mark I think I might fish and thought one comment interesting regarding returning a y ting, and comment made “stand on it first”and thought a interesting sentiment.
Edit, could of course been black humour and kind of get it 🤔
 
Last edited:
Certain fish release far better than others.

I fish measure and release matches, but I doubt many of the fish returned actually last very long. Having buckets of dead fish at a weigh in would be a PR disaster nowadays, but I doubt C&R has made much difference.
 
He's probably about right. Hot acidic hands don't agree with them for a start and few creatures enjoy being dragged about on the end of a hook. I've seen so called match anglers rip fish off the hook in their hurry to get back in the water. Also have walked along one of our local beaches after a match and seen hundreds of dead mostly undersized fish which I think is disgraceful.
 
Also have walked along one of our local beaches after a match and seen hundreds of dead mostly undersized fish which I think is disgraceful.
The issue with undersized fish is often the swell, on my recent trips I had a couple of pout & doggies washed back on to the beach by the surf & it wasn't even that rough,.
The doggies can handle being thrown further out behind the waves but I have my doubts on the pout surviving, at least I made the effort.
 
He's probably about right. Hot acidic hands don't agree with them for a start and few creatures enjoy being dragged about on the end of a hook. I've seen so called match anglers rip fish off the hook in their hurry to get back in the water. Also have walked along one of our local beaches after a match and seen hundreds of dead mostly undersized fish which I think is disgraceful.
There are a lot of savages out there :cry:

As for the acidity surely it'll very quickly get diluted away once they're back in the sea?

I don't fish matches, weigh them, etc. As soon as I have them, if they're clearly undersize, I put them back in the sea as quickly (and gently) as possible - I hope they make it.
 

Dragging a fish in over 150 yards bumping about the seabed for much of it, plus a hook stuck in it, often quite deep. Whiting and pouting also spin all the way in, which must disorientate them and possibly damage them internally. I’ve watched thousands of whiting and pouting get released since C&R matches started and most of them end up as seagull food. It’s good PR and much better than the public seeing hundreds of dead fish washing along the beach at the end of a weigh-in match. We fished clacton pier on Sunday and we put back a lot of undersize fish, most of which appeared to swim away strongly, with the odd one going belly up straight away. Just by watching the tide, about 80 yards away from the pier, the gulls would gather and scoff the whiting as they floated to the surface.

Bass I think survive as do flatfish provided they aren’t deep hooked. I cringe when people boast about returning all their fish. In my opinion they’d be better off not fishing at all. If you want to return fish, do it by all means, but don’t make a big thing about it. You’re just fuelling the antis-using fish for pleasure and not actually fishing for something to eat. We’ve already got a two fish limit on bass, don’t give the government a reason to put more restrictions on us.
 
The issue with undersized fish is often the swell, on my recent trips I had a couple of pout & doggies washed back on to the beach by the surf & it wasn't even that rough,.
The doggies can handle being thrown further out behind the waves but I have my doubts on the pout surviving, at least I made the effort.

Dogs, hounds and rays have a nasty habit of beaching themselves after release. I try and wade out to release them, as this gives them a better chance.
 
We fished clacton pier on Sunday and we put back a lot of undersize fish, most of which appeared to swim away strongly, with the odd one going belly up straight away. Just by watching the tide, about 80 yards away from the pier, the gulls would gather and scoff the whiting as they floated to the surface.
Jesus! :cry:


Bass I think survive as do flatfish provided they aren’t deep hooked. I cringe when people boast about returning all their fish. In my opinion they’d be better off not fishing at all. If you want to return fish, do it by all means, but don’t make a big thing about it. You’re just fuelling the antis-using fish for pleasure and not actually fishing for something to eat. We’ve already got a two fish limit on bass, don’t give the government a reason to put more restrictions on us.
I'll keep and eat fish what are within size. Having said that - I've heard what seems to be a very good reason to return the big fish too - they're super breeders!
 
Some good musings there. Never fished any heaviest bag comps and was disgusted by them even then, but certainly when I was younger we fished for best specimen and would keep one or two fish.
Seems criminal now that double figure hounds and conger would be killed just to take to a weigh in to try and win a few quid.
I did the same and not proud of it, but literally everyone was doing it, thankfully now that attitude has mostly changed.

Your questions on the bling, live baiting and hair rig have all been discussed on here I believe. Not that it hurts to discuss them again!

No problem taking sizeable fish to a weigh-in, provided the fish get taken home and eaten. Although I fish them, I don’t really agree with anything over 18cm matches, I still feel we should fish to ministry size limits. Only problem there is, in many matches, there wouldn’t be any fish measured. What a terrible state our seas are in.
 
Jesus! :cry:



I'll keep and eat fish what are within size. Having said that - I've heard what seems to be a very good reason to return the big fish too - they're super breeders!

I think we need to go down the American route, where you have a minimum and maximum size limit. The big fish then keep producing fry and the younger fish are able to breed.
 
There are a lot of savages out there :cry:

As for the acidity surely it'll very quickly get diluted away once they're back in the sea?

I don't fish matches, weigh them, etc. As soon as I have them, if they're clearly undersize, I put them back in the sea as quickly (and gently) as possible - I hope they make it.
I also don't fish matches,I'm as gentle with the fish as possible, when unhooking, weighing, returning them.
 
Not a match angler but going from own experiences over time if fishing at height with no steps or not safe to use, doubt some fish survive the drop along with deep hooked under size fish which is just common sense really.
Might add only fish in winter for the cod fish now but oft wondered what percentage of small ling survive having swim bladder punctured and returned whilst boat fishing, maybe someone knows if they survive?
 

Support Us

Support from our members means we don't need to plaster advertisements around the website! Keeping it clean and fresh! Maintaining a website such as this takes time and money, and your support helps to keep the lights on, provide new features for the website and, hopefully, make you feel warm and fuzzy!

Thank you for considering to help support our work.
Back
Top