Mickfish
Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2024
- Messages
- 26
- Reaction score
- 64
- Points
- 13
- Location
- Warrington
- Favourite Fishing
- Shore
As someone returning to his sea fishing roots at the age of 72 I dusted down the sea fishing tackle I bought some years ago: Shakespeare 14' Extreme Blue Metal fs - 4-8 0z; Grey's BZe Bass 11' 6" 2/3 oz; Shakespeare Odessa Flattie 10'/ Reels include an old Abu Ambassador 7000 I use for light boat fishing, an Abu 6500 mag (both have level winds) an original old Daiwa Millionaire converted to tournament style and Shimano fs Biomaster 8000. All tackle is in good nick but I will be re-oiling/greasing the reels. Braid on the fs and 0.33 good mono on the multipliers with suitable shock leaders.
I've just had some refresher lessons in off the ground casting and what I've found is the big Shakespeare feels like it is controlling me. I've not yet cast again with the two smaller rods. I know distance isn't everything and in some contexts short casting is the way to go. But if I think to my salmon fly fishing I never fish with 15' rods as I feel I can not compress them effectively. I am 5' 7" and a 14' or 13' salmon fly rod rod is very much under my control in that I can compress it effectively and consistently achieve good casting results.
I've been watching lots of casting videos on Your Tube and one by a much older John Holden struck me as he said (and I paraphrase), if you find a shorter rod that you can cast effectively with then stick to that as you probably achieve more consistent results. As I've said, in my salmon fishing, this is a philosophy I agree with with. I may enlarge my rod range and understand the massive development of more through actioned continental rods and fs combos which allow the average Joe like me to attain good results but there is again the length/compression issue. Or, there may be an attraction in a rod like the AFAW 4 plus bait, or even their estuary rod. So I'm just thinking allowed and have penned these thoughts into words. I am based in Warrington and my fishing is going to be based on Mersey/Dee estuaries, North Wales and Lancashire coasts. I would appreciate any comments by anglers more experienced than me on the issue of angler height, rod length and compression ability when casting please.
Mick
I've just had some refresher lessons in off the ground casting and what I've found is the big Shakespeare feels like it is controlling me. I've not yet cast again with the two smaller rods. I know distance isn't everything and in some contexts short casting is the way to go. But if I think to my salmon fly fishing I never fish with 15' rods as I feel I can not compress them effectively. I am 5' 7" and a 14' or 13' salmon fly rod rod is very much under my control in that I can compress it effectively and consistently achieve good casting results.
I've been watching lots of casting videos on Your Tube and one by a much older John Holden struck me as he said (and I paraphrase), if you find a shorter rod that you can cast effectively with then stick to that as you probably achieve more consistent results. As I've said, in my salmon fishing, this is a philosophy I agree with with. I may enlarge my rod range and understand the massive development of more through actioned continental rods and fs combos which allow the average Joe like me to attain good results but there is again the length/compression issue. Or, there may be an attraction in a rod like the AFAW 4 plus bait, or even their estuary rod. So I'm just thinking allowed and have penned these thoughts into words. I am based in Warrington and my fishing is going to be based on Mersey/Dee estuaries, North Wales and Lancashire coasts. I would appreciate any comments by anglers more experienced than me on the issue of angler height, rod length and compression ability when casting please.
Mick
Last edited: